LIFE, MATTER AND UNIVERSE

20/28

The full total does not exist fragmented as it seems externally

The following are some correct observations and logical conclusions, as we often hear: "There is no reason to believe that consciousness exists after the destruction of the brain," "consciousness exists through brain functions." But those who use these easy observations and the findings of experience make the biggest mistake: They remove the whole universe from their expe­rience and have not explained how physical processes are organized in mi­croscopic dimensions and how natural laws are maintained. This is realized by the ascertainment that life is inseparable from the physical and biological processes (...) and the consciousness is lost when we die, so it is not proven that life and consciousness are the result of these processes alone. We can easily say "look, this is one thing," we can easily say that "the brain is the seat of mental functions and consciousness," but it is difficult to explain how the particles that are constantly moving (as all people blindly repeat) form balanced forms and organized things. In nature, the "assembly" materi­als start at a size much smaller than 10 billionth of one meter (10nm). In these dimensions, modern processors are constructed not as a result of chance, but organized with scientific knowledge. Note:

1) In nature materials which have dimensions less than 10nm (i.e., with more density of contacts than the most modern processor) are "assembled", for life to arise.

2) and these materials are not static such as contacts in a microchip

3) and moreover, a huge variety of atomic compounds is formed by these materials that serve as new materials again to assemble the most complex things such as organic molecules and cells.

4) Not only the biological cells, but also the entire astronomical world is preserved (with improbable mathematical precision and synchronized).

Well, this natural phenomenon of the assembling of ordinary things, as it is realized with the four difficulties which we above enumerated, is not the result of luck and it is not explained by the individual movements of each particle. The organization of their dynamic assembly is accomplished by natural forces that do not reside within each particle separately but out of matter. The laws are actually simple and that's why they are laws, since they often appear everywhere in nature. Many physicists have note this simplicity.

But from where does nature introduce and apply them? Are physical laws re­mote-controlled?

Are embedded (built-in) into molecules? Are into the forces and are transported singing "ride like wind"?

Those who talk about matter and about biology believing that it is obvious that there is nothing else besides the separate parts observed with laboratory instruments, should think better about these successes of nature. Do not you notice that nature is organized while it can be analyzed in such a small detail? They do not think and they do well, if they do not have curiosity and interest or a professional utilization. But do not rush to say like some physicists of the 18th century that you know the natural processes well and the only problem is computa­tional because of the many involved parties. We leave a question out, and this is the main issue of how nature has such creative action and the prospect of organizing matter in biological bodies. We do not say that life is not de­scribed by the laws of physics. We say that life is not described exclusively by the laws of physics and not at all with mechanical movements of parti­cles and their individual forces.

* Source: Part 4 (Universe and matter, Spirit and life. Short answers to big questions) from the second volume of the treatise under the title "Complete Universe, Dynamic Space & Wave Phenomena" and the subtitle "How the natural laws and forces are applied. The fundamental concepts and relations for a rational Cosmology (Cosmonomy)" ©2021, ISBN 978-618-85170-1-1 (set), ISBN 978-618-85170-3-5 (vol2).