LIFE, MATTER AND UNIVERSE

9/28

However, the view we have in advance about God may be completely different from God that will be determined by scientific knowledge. If, to date, the question on the existence of God does not belong to the scientific field, this does not mean that this issue will always be outside the field of scientific research. Instead, here I state clearly to you that not only this particular issue will lie in scientific thinking in the future, but it has already lied there in this book. The observations and thoughts, which will follow in certain order and careful wording, belong to scientific thought. They open the gate to think about what we need to investigate in nature and what observations can be validated. Here we talk about observations and thoughts belonging to science and by "belonging" we mean that these observations on the existence of God are connected with natural phenomena and calculations that cannot be ignored by any researcher of nature. Instead, these observations and calculations are needed to solve some other scientific problems and to advance the research of nature as a whole arranged with laws. If our research into the involvement of a God in nature and life is now proceeding with more observations on natural phenomena, this does not mean that until now there has been no observation in the things that strengthens this view of the existence of God. From ancient times to the present, almost all of the observations and rational thoughts, which support the case of the existence of a God, have been written by the famous philosophers. Professors of philosophy are comprehensively informed on this subject. However, until now, such observations and theories have been missing, which are not only clues but enhance the case of the existence of God after a correlation of God with natural phenomena and an explanation of the appearance of life. Some modern researchers find that natural processes are performed with mathematical precision and with such a mathematical analogy that intelligence cannot be absent. If the conclusion that there is God results from high-precision observations in natural processes or from improbable natural phenomena which are necessary for the visible world to remain organized, in this case it is not convincing conclusion. Also, no atheist will believe in God if the proof of a God includes unexplained natural phenomena or some phenomena observed only in a laboratory and abstruse theories with assumptions.

Then, which God be demonstrated through research of nature and observations of common experience? The indisputable answer must come from the observations, calculations and interpretations of natural phenomena. An answer is not convincing for all thinking people if it results from experiences that cannot be confirmed and repeated. Also the answers with thoughts on imaginary worlds and with few clues are not convincing to change our lives. In the following brief thoughts there is no proof of God's existence. However, these are the important and apposite observations that lead to the proof for the first time as they would like in Science.

In order to use the concept of "God" we must first trace a minimal trait that distinguishes it from the inanimate things (or from the dead bodies). That is, when we say "God," we mean something more than matter and external movements. Do we agree so far? We must also rule out that we call "God" a human (such as a footballer) or an animal or an alien, so that we do not fall into a trap of reasoning. Also, if we call "God" the Universe or nature as Spinoza said without accepting any trait of life, then we accept a "God" of material bodies adjusted with laws but no trace of life or soul or spirit. So we do not mean such a "God" without any trait of life or any mortal biological existence.

* Source: Part 4 (Universe and matter, Spirit and life. Short answers to big questions) from the second volume of the treatise under the title "Complete Universe, Dynamic Space & Wave Phenomena" and the subtitle "How the natural laws and forces are applied. The fundamental concepts and relations for a rational Cosmology (Cosmonomy)" ©2021, ISBN 978-618-85170-1-1 (set), ISBN 978-618-85170-3-5 (vol2).