circular time - completed and stabilised 99,9% Universe


©2010 ISBN 978-960-93-2431-1   |   ©2012 ISBN 978-960-93-4040-3



Theory of completed time and the relativity of energy
(A unified theory on time, space, matter and forces)

Attention! Translational errors exist


preexists the completed total...

"They are not the exterior material things which with their movement, approaching, removal, union and segregation achieve a balanced Total (of things) and maintenance of physical laws. On the contrary the complete total of Cosmos preexists..."




The suggestion that connects the philosophy with mathematics and drives at the simply experience observations in the scientific area of physics and in the thought about relativity of time with simply logic:

The Universe is perfect because is present, immutable and “solid”  within the limits of one utmost total time - and for this reason “immediate” exists. The growth of phenomenal absurd and contradictory idea  lead to incre­dible logical conse­quences!

For first time, a philosophical thought about the beginning of the Universe is formulated with a quantitative relation, which is regulating and decisive for the all things and with the direct requirement, the thought to seek some reasonable consequences of this quantitative relation in the existence of things. Still, for first time, such a general thought that is reported in its entirety the world immediately connected with mathematics and has a prospect for research in order to we ascertain some reasonable consequences of this quantitative relation in physical phenomena and moreover, with the expectation we might make some measurements and calculations. Because, the initial reasonable thought imports a quantitative relation as is the biggest time period and time concerns the all individual things. That it means, we can think how a maximum time period influences them, what relations imposes and what marks causes by some way in individual things.


Physicists had not said that they do not know… They had said that do not exist limits and even, the change of a size does not depend from the limits of its change or in certain other sizes! Leading physicists and capable researchers did not think the most likely interpretations about the impasses in modern physics and they did not use certain of simple equations before they seek solutions with complicated mathematics and before place questions about paradoxical phenomena. Every one with knowledge of a student of medium education can understand the below equations and realize the turn in the research and how the mathematic formulation is simplified, if few fundamental proportions had been used even as a supposition (for a test)! In those who said for philosophy that has not contribute something in scientific knowledge, I would wish they answer in this my query: Where do belong the following quantitative relations, in Philosophy or Physics? 


1st publication on Earth

ISBN 978-960-93-2431-1 © 2009 - 2010

fmax = Vmax / λmin            λmin = Vmax / fmax = Vmax Tmin | όπου λmin = h


Emax = h fmax = h / Tmin = h c / λmin = Mmax c2           Mmax = h fmax / c2 = h / c λmin


Tmax = Vmax / amin               Tmin = λmin / Vmax           Tmin = λmin / Vmax = Vmax / amax


Fundamental relation for the unification of physical phenomena

Vmax = amin Tmax = amax Tmin



Emax / Emin = Tmax / Tmin                 P = h fmin / Tmin =  h fmax / Tmax



Since the start of his philosophical searches in the decade of '80s, one young man with low educative level wrote the below cogitations and daily he removed the consequences that are imposed in individual things, from his initial admission:


" All things constitute a constant total in the limits of one moment, they are not infinite in number, they do not affect with unlimited ways each other and the most indirect way that each one other influences is not endless ". p139


" If the total of things were not a direct cause of itself, if it were not a stabilized quality (inside of a total time), then the said things would not constitute manners of a common substance. They would exist with unspecified manners and unlimited possibilities, in unspecified moments, without continuity nowise and they could not be with a relatively constant and united quality, neither have common elements ". p145


" We should not speak about the law of conservation of energy or matter (that is to say, about an abstract reality), but on the law of the stability of the Universe quality, which is enounced with perfect clearness (better-aimed) and more explicit ". p149


“ The world moment is not constituted by endless or infinite number of smaller moments, otherwise the Universe would not always be the itself in the limits of one (wide) moment. The limits of the sub-moments should not be smaller than a certain minimal limit (otherwise they would be infinite in number) ”. p153


" A biggest time limit exists, the Universal Moment, which cannot be divided unlimitedly, therefore also a minimal moment exists, by that are predetermined temporally limits in the indirect (material) interactions and in things, that exist as some (combined) ways of interaction in the substance and thus have a direct (or close) relation with time (...) All things should change by such ways, so that always would be maintained same the Quality of the Universe. We should not speak about the law of conservation of energy or matter (that is to say, about the abstract reality), but on the best-aimed law of a Finished Time (Stable Maximum Period) ". p269


◄ If the Universe can be remain the same within the same time interval of a longest period, then all individual things with their movements should change with determined limits and do not specified only from other external things.

Almost 20 years afterwards, the previous ascertainment with the formu­lation well adapted in vocabulary of physics is synopsized as following:


If the Universe can be remain the same within the same time interval of a longest period, and so as the law of conservation of energy has a meaning, then all individual things with their movements should change synchro­nized with the simultaneous and dynamic participation of their Common Total. The Common Total from its nearest distance appears to us as a nuclear force while from far appears as absence of a free space. So, enforced certain irreducible limits (min) and biggest (max) limits in changes: in time t and T, length l and λ, in speed V, at frequency f, rate of change of speed ±a, change of mass M, transfer of energy hf, size of force F.

For example this philosophical thought: "Matter without a preceding and complexional reality it would not had a structure and stabilized existence". With termi­nology of Physics, "the preceding and complexional reality" participates such as a free space, while matter and its dynamic structure interpreted with e/m waves at the balanced energy of the free space. The same thought with another wording and more analysis reiterated in many excerpts yet.




Do you speak yet, about a total creation of the Universe also about the fantasy of a Big Bang ?



All philosophical efforts about cosmological questions from time of Hegel and Maxwell up to today were using discoveries from physics. Philosophers did not invoke simply these discoveries in order to strengthen their own theories but further were incorporating and using them in their theory in order to base and develop their own philosophical theories. Seeing the rapid growth of sciences and mainly in physics, many thinkers were in a hurry to declare that Philosophy died. Some philosophers focused their thinking exclusively in questions about the human logic and meaning of human life. For first time is happen (as much as I know in the last 150 roughly years), a philosophical theory is formulated beginning from usual general terms and by rational thinking reaches in formulation of proportions and physical limits, with the terms of physics, without experiments and calculations. The theory of a Complete Time and Universe achieves the interpretation of many physical phenomena and reveals their unknown relations by only one conjecture and fundamental phenomena.  



Theory of a Completed Time → Complete and Simultaneous Universe

and Relativity of Energy → Finite free space with balanced quantity of energy and fluctuations









* Almost 20 years ceaseless and multifaceted theoretical research was needed in order to above ascertainment be formulated so separately, concisely and in usual vocabulary. I wish you do not need other so much years until you lead to this same ascertainment!






Go to Top