|
The suggestion that connects the philosophy with mathematics and drives at the simply
experience observations in the scientific area of physics and in the thought about relativity of time with simply logic:
The Universe is perfect
because is present,
immutable and “solid” within the limits of one utmost total time
- and for this reason
“immediate” exists.
The growth of phenomenal absurd and contradictory idea lead to incredible logical consequences!
For first time, a
philosophical thought about the beginning of the Universe is
formulated with a quantitative relation, which is regulating
and decisive for the all things and with the direct requirement, the thought to seek some reasonable consequences of
this quantitative relation in the existence of things. Still,
for first time, such a general thought that is reported in its
entirety the world immediately connected with mathematics and has a prospect for research in order to we ascertain some reasonable consequences of this quantitative
relation in physical phenomena and moreover, with the expectation we
might make some measurements and calculations. Because, the
initial reasonable thought imports a quantitative relation as
is the biggest time period and time concerns the all
individual things. That it means, we can think how a maximum time period influences them, what relations imposes and what marks causes by
some way in individual things.
Physicists had
not said that they do not know… They had said that do not exist
limits and even, the change of a size
does not depend from the limits of its change or in certain other sizes! Leading physicists and capable researchers did not think the
most likely interpretations about the impasses in modern physics and they did not use certain of simple equations before they seek solutions
with complicated mathematics and before place questions about paradoxical phenomena. Every one with knowledge of a student of medium education
can understand the below equations and realize the turn in the research and how the mathematic formulation is simplified, if few fundamental
proportions had been used even as a supposition (for a test)! In those who said for philosophy that has not contribute something in scientific
knowledge, I would wish they answer in this my query: Where do belong the following quantitative relations, in Philosophy or Physics?
ISBN
978-960-93-2431-1 © 2009 - 2010
Emax
= h fmax
= h / Tmin =
h c / λmin
= Mmax
c2
Mmax
= h fmax
/ c2
= h / c
λmin
Fundamental relation
for the unification of physical phenomena
Vmax
= amin Tmax
= amax Tmin
PRINCIPLE FOR
CONSERVATION OF THE POWER (AND NOT ENERGY)
Emax
/ Emin = Tmax / Tmin
P = h fmin
/ Tmin = h fmax
/
Tmax
Since the start of his philosophical searches in the decade of '80s, one young man with
low educative level wrote the below cogitations and daily he removed the consequences that are imposed in
individual things, from his initial admission:
" All things constitute a constant total in the limits of one moment, they are not
infinite in number, they do not affect with unlimited ways
each other and the most indirect way that each one other influences is not endless ".
p139
" If the total of
things were not a direct cause of itself, if it were not a stabilized quality (inside of a total time), then the said
things would not constitute manners of a common substance. They
would exist with unspecified manners and unlimited possibilities,
in unspecified moments, without continuity nowise and they could
not be with a relatively constant and united quality, neither
have common elements ".
p145
" We should not speak about the law of conservation of energy or matter (that is to
say, about an abstract reality), but on the law
of the stability of the Universe quality, which is enounced with
perfect clearness (better-aimed) and more explicit ".
p149
“ The world moment is not constituted
by endless or infinite number of smaller moments, otherwise the Universe would not
always be the itself in the limits of one (wide) moment. The limits of the
sub-moments should not be smaller than a certain minimal limit (otherwise they would
be infinite in number) ”. p153
" A
biggest time limit exists, the Universal Moment, which cannot be
divided unlimitedly, therefore also a minimal moment exists, by that
are predetermined temporally limits in the indirect (material)
interactions and in things, that exist as some (combined) ways of interaction in the substance and thus have a direct (or close) relation with
time (...) All things should change by such ways, so that always would be maintained same the Quality of the Universe. We should not speak about
the law of conservation of energy or matter (that is to say, about the abstract reality), but on the best-aimed law of a Finished
Time (Stable Maximum Period) ". p269
◄ If the Universe can be remain the same within the same time interval of a
longest period, then all individual things with their movements should change with determined limits and do not
specified only from other external things.
Almost 20 years afterwards, the previous ascertainment with the formulation well
adapted in vocabulary of physics is synopsized
as following:
If the Universe can be remain the same within the same time interval of a longest period, and
so as the law of conservation of energy has a meaning, then all individual things with their
movements should change synchronized with the
simultaneous and dynamic participation of their Common Total. The Common Total from its nearest distance appears to us as a nuclear force while from far
appears as absence of a free space.
So, enforced certain irreducible limits (min) and biggest
(max) limits in changes: in time t and T, length l and λ, in speed V, at frequency f, rate of change of speed ±a, change of mass M, transfer of energy hf,
size of force F.
For example this
philosophical thought: "Matter without a preceding and
complexional reality it would not had a structure and stabilized
existence". With terminology of Physics, "the preceding
and complexional reality" participates such as a free space, while matter and its dynamic structure interpreted with e/m waves at the balanced energy of the free space. The same
thought with another wording and more analysis reiterated in
many excerpts yet.
|
