|
Some clarifications on concept of "shared amount of energy"
Space as something empty and clean (with three dimensions) is already the object of geometry as an ideal and homogeneous quantity.
Euclid's original geometry already gave some quantitative relations between points, lines and simple shapes. We know that a space of more
dimensions in theory has given new axioms and theorems and it is described by newer geometries (as the geometries of Riemann and Lobachevsky).
In these sciences, space is described as ideal and they do not study whether it is a physical phenomenon or whether it has its own structure.
From the research of the 20th century we have been informed that physical space is not just a human idea and it has its own properties and an
invisible synergy to energy transfer phenomena and presence of particles. A leap to think that physical space is something essential and
dynamically connected to matter has already taken place from the Theory of General Relativity. Well-known physicists have already referred to
free space as a reservoir or ocean of energy. The description of space-time as a rubber surface is an image to understand the space as closely
related to matter, but this simile hides the physical phenomena, which are not immediately visible.
From the previous reminders we understand that space is already something we explore as quantity. But any theory has not yet been established
that goes further and interprets physical space as a physical phenomenon, which is connected to matter and bodies by a known connection process
and to certain physical phenomena. From my own theoretical research and according to the cosmological theory of a complete Universe in maximum
Time, physical space is also something which has properties and an inseparable relationship with matter in extremely tiny dimensions. The main
feature of space as a quantity is that behaves with waves, that is, it disturbs and produces forces, waves and fluctuations of energy. If I
describe the physical space as a quantity of energy, by the term of "energy" I do not mean that its essence is merely such a quantity. I use the
term of energy because indeed and according to calculations, the physical space can be described and interpreted as a quantity of energy, as
modern physics requires. But for my own mind it is not obvious and completely understandable what exactly is physical space as a substance
and if it is purely a physical phenomenon.
I have to describe physical space in terms of physics (as energy, perturbation, wave behavior, wave contribution, etc.) because this is how we
can first interpret it, before we even think about the most difficult issues regarding the properties of space. If I started writing about the
space in phrasal terms that are not acceptable in physics and if I interpreted it by phenomena of my imagination, then I would certainly uproot
the credibility of interpreting space according to the requirements of science and the ridicule would were easy. Already the logical phrase
"shared amount of energy" to describe space as a natural phenomenon is not recognized by the trained mind of a physicist and of course raises
questions. But
I am not responsible for the fact that nature includes such a phenomenon, which is invisible, intangible and does not appear from the senses as
a separate thing, among other things.
The physical space is something that exists from extremely small dimensions to the farthest distances and is something by which structural
elements (matter) are maintained as repetitive waves at microscopic lengths and at almost the speed of light. And let us not forget that along
with this connection of matter to the shared amount of energy, many other widespread phenomena coexist, such as the gravitational field of
bodies. The gravitational force which according to the GTR is a deformation of space-time also has quantitative characteristics and is described
mathematically. An average energy density of space is examined and a constant is introduced to balance gravitational attraction in many modern
cosmological theories. So, it is not at all strange to think of physical space as a natural quantity which is dynamically connected to matter
and has the characteristic of energy. |
|