CYCLICAL TIME – COMPLETE & SIMULTANEOUS
UNIVERSE
Theory on a complete time and the relativity of energy
(A unified theory about time,
space and matter)

The close
relation between mass and speed of electromagnetic
waves (2)

We can and calculate acceleration
±a, time t, the length λ or l, the frequency f
on the base of a maximum limit of speed Vmax (that appears coincide with light
c), without the object M that is moved and accelerated and without the
relation of object M with some force F, from which it receives the
energy. That is to say, we have formulas as follow :

λ f^{2} =
V^{2} /λ = V/t = a , V =λf =
λ /t = a t , V^{2} = a λ ,

tmin= 1/ fmax → tmax = 1/ fmin,

t =V / a =
λ/ V , ω = V/r = 2π f

and with children's logic without we know the limits in numerical values, we can insert the biggest and minimal
limits max and min in general.

However, the force F (kg m /s^{2})
and momentum p (kg m/s) in their units contain quantity kg (mass M)
that belong in the object, which we can ignore for the
experiments in our thought. If, however, the object which is
accelerated does created of some motion in most microscopic
dimensions and it doesn't exist in advance as independent, as a multitude of phenomena
show us and the simple logic? Any
physicist on a lot of dead-end decades didn't attempt a such logical case, mass in the structure
of matter is something that is caused or created by phenomena of motion,
without the presence of mass, such as mass that we perceive in our visible world. The Newtonian definition for mass, already allow us we
attempt an enlargement of this definition. In the Newton's season were unknown the role of electromagnetism in nature and the presence of
electromagnetic waves everywhere in nature, as an
attributive piece
of world, which we do not observe it (same as the material bodies), but it does not constitutes
a
lack of substance and reality. The blind and formal use of term " mass "
thenceforth, it
led to impasses, it prevented the progress of physics and a lot of
scientists was said many fooleries. Albert Einstein, where proves the close relation
between mass
with an equivalent quantity of energy (E=
M c^{2})
and his theories of relativity left open the field for the
scientists -deprived from imagination- to think mathematically
about the relativity of length and time, he made an enormous
jump. No other physicist was found to make a proportional achieved jump. The
next jump in physics is the unification between phenomenon of mass with
electromagnetism and naturally the last phenomenon with gravity.

The unification about phenomenon of mass with electromagnetism begins when we reveal the close relation of this
phenomenon with motion in general. It begins with the
thought that the inertia and mass are phenomena that are
inherent in the signification of the broad phenomenon of motion (as a
relation of change in time and length) and when we
formulate the first relations mathematically, that are confirmed
after we apply
them in order to we describe the microscopic particles and the
structure of matter. Then, the search what is motion with
which are caused the particles, or what is a motion without matter and particles,
does not exist other logical answer, from the presence of void (free) space and the
wave change that is caused in its balanced energy…

The
constant M λm
= 2,21021 ×10^{-42}
kg·m in accordance with well known physics, does not mean, nothing. It expresses
theoretically a mass in multiplication with a vague length and nothing other. When,
however, we interpret the particles, that have a relevant mass M such as products of
speed, motion and change of length and time, then the constant M λm=
2,21021 ×10^{-42} kg·m
get an interest and more importance.

The mass (M) is fixed by
the relation of force (F) with the change in a motion (M=F/a).
If motion is caused by null initial speed or if motion
becomes with a
constant speed and this is altered, the relation
F/a
remains and the result continues expressing a mass and a phenomenon of inertia.
In other words, mass expresses a particular case in the change of speed
and that is resisted in this change or time delay until
the change becomes and
completed. With the continual application of same force F, the body
with bigger mass M will need more time t in order
to it acquires the maximum speed Vmax comparatively to the body of smaller mass. With same force
F, as long as more time needs, so much bigger is mass and on the contrary
(M=F t/V).

If the increase of speed does not exceed
a limit Vmax, thus with a clean reasoning a biggest limit in the
change of speed (± amax) results, that is to say, in how much
fast can the speed increases or decreases itself. In other words
results a limit in the acceleration and deceleration ±a. Parcel with
these relations goes also the force, after does not exist force
which causes faster speed than a biggest limit neither faster
change of speed in infinite small time interval. If therefore,
mass is considered more widely as a phenomenon of change in
motion with the
proportional reaction or delay in this change (change, which is obviously caused by
some force or by the perturbation of certain balanced forces), thus simply and
with the consequence of reasonings, it results that mass cannot increases
unlimitedly. The inertia, the reaction in the change of
motion or the delay owe
to have also them a biggest limit (Mmax), as it has the change of speed (±
amax). Because in the case of creation of matter and mass of particles, the
force F isn't obviously exterior and applied from an other clean phenomenon of
a
mass and the force is " in-wrought " with the structure of matter, we cannot say
immediately what is the relation of their limits, based on the
Newton's type, who
described an exterior relation and evident between a body and the force.

In physics, the
dimensional content in force F contains unit of mass (that is to say kg).
If however, mass is a phenomenon that is caused more
generally by the change of the (wave) motion and from the
maintenance or repetition of this change, then mass
is not a different phenomenon comparably itself motion, the
speed and force.
The mass in the microscopic space is the result of a combination of these phenomena,
when they are altered. The mass such as it is fixed by the optical description of
an uncreated situation and existence in nature, it is presented itself as a
separate and self-existent phenomenon with hidden the permanent relation,
that mass has with the phenomenon of motion and change
always.

Because the inertia and mass are phenomena that are inherent in the significance of motion, mass
can be varied in proportion to the change in motion and with the change in the sizes of other related phenomena, but also it dependent of
the limit that is inserted by the limit in speed. In our calculations, are need the same terms in all phenomena.

We see at the following left formulas,
the length λ does result since formulas that include mass Μ and
since formulas that does not include mass Μ. How would to be solved so that we find mass Μ ?

Simple relations of physics, which the most capable researchers use them in
order to solve the most tangled mathematic problems and find solutions in impasses of modern physics, these relations should
they had been supplemented and delimited by professionals physicists. A lot of decades were
lost! With a short
thought (for example, does not exist an infinity of things), which it could
say even one insane man, consequences result in science where physicists and astronomers specialise. If they began in their off-hand
exercise book with a simple supposition, as they make often, they would lead in important observations and they would open the
impasse in physics and mathematic interpretation on the structure of matter and Universe.

Mpl
/ Mc
►
This ratio 16.357 and the small relatively disparity between limits in the two cases is
important and instructive for the research, mainly for the following observation: With a small ratio, it do not change extremely the enormous
numbers, the quantities (after the exhibitor almost remains the itself), however they change
subversively the units and the phenomena that we describe.