"Ether doesn't exist, neither absolute motion and point for reference, but only related motions for observers", Einstein claims and since then physicists literally have bewilder us in order to we accept this dark concept. Nevertheless, the relativity of time and length in the inquiring field of Physics did not prevent researchers to speak globally about the things, to count the distances between galaxies and an age of the Universe. They say to us that does not exist an absolute time or a common point for report on the measurement of time. Without no one understand well, they say abstractedly to us, time is relative. These their thoughts do not prevent to tell about an age of the universe, that is to say about a time interval which is common for the all things…The speed limit of light does not a common limit for the multitude of different things? Different bodies are moved with different speeds comparatively from each other and a multitude of changes have different rates. But the speed of light is a limit almost for all things, if not for entire the Universe?
1 Attention! Translational errors exist
The definition of word "Universe" in the 21st century
Research about origin of world, observation of sky, scripts and thoughts about world beyond our planet and how could be such a world are attractive questions for commercial aims. These always charmed most people. We can find inexhaustible information and thoughts about the Universe, however here we will stand in the general definition of the Universe according to some scientific observations. It is impressive the resemblance of definition as is formulated in most cases, after it is not easy for anyone to express his own thoughts. If somebody does not want is ridiculed will say something that it has ascertained from researchers, and in this case is better to repeats what heard or read.
► We will take as a sample the definition of the Universe where we find in the electronic encyclopedia Wikipedia, in Greek and in English publication. Follows the general definition in Greek publication (11/7/09) :
Little below :
This usual definition of the Universe in the 21st century does not make something else apart from repeats with more words, what the unique word expresses, as it defined in the brief explanatory dictionaries. The universe is everything and accordingly it includes each what everywhere in space and time. Somehow thus the humans was thinking in ancient years and because they didn't consider things well distinguished each other, they preferred to call (a unified presence of world) with some other words and, with few imagination. The world was kind of an egg... and people preferred the concept of "God".
If we observe the words in definition of the Universe, with few bad faith we can show how much shallow is this thought in science. Eg. "continuum" means lack of discontinuity? Do not stick in this. We will still observe in this definition of the Universe, a usual exclusion of all centuries that preceded from Alb. Einstein' time. Because modern scientists do not consider as knowledge, if this emanated only from reasonable thoughts, without experiments and in earlier times when the research only just had originate. Scientists selected their own thoughts and observations, that make with more modern methods and complicated instruments and for far objects in space.
We will not lose our time with analyzing these meanings and will not miss the target of our report about the definition of the Universe. Remark only a query:
In the 21st century we still read a definition of the Universe for children, when in philosophy has been recorded almost this same definition a lot of centuries ago and in certain cases more revelatory! If the inflation of the free space and the word "hyperball" are constitute some new discoveries relevant so as the general definition of the Universe is supplemented, then imagination and superficiality is not absent from the current science. After of so much scientific careful thought in order to is not said something uncertain and once again modern scientists did not avoid their imagination!
► We go to the general definition that we find (11/7/09) in the English publication of famous Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universe ):
We will observe in the short English formulation that the concept of the Universe includes a main trait, something where it escaped from the first lines in Greek publication: the physical laws and the numerical constants. It is a particularly important observation and more advanced suggestion on definition. Because the Universe is not simply a number of things and exchanges of energy from each other point. There are restrictions, coercions and conditions that they do not emanate from individual and concrete things. These emanate from the form of the Total of things and from the existence of the Total things which is preceded from the presence of individual and occasional things.
The "physical laws" and "numerical constants" perhaps bring different thoughts, however really these are common phrases that hide some big answers. Without these answers the physical laws remain simple thoughts that have recorded from a lot of centuries ago and do not add nothing in the definition of the Universe, such as we find in magazines and books of 21st century.
This stagnation and lack of progress for the general definition of the Universe betray enormous ignorance and a misinterpretation in modern cosmology. Of course, we can find a more careful thought for the Universe and with better expectation for research in philosophy.
► Universe: The common Total of all things from all moments and COMPLETE in the same (wide) present, where it remains incomplete and in development for the individual and material things.
The complete Universe is always itself in the limits of a biggest time interval and creation becomes permanently through the structure of matter. Matter constitutes the minimal moments of beforehand completed reality in the limits of a biggest time period (common time [Tuni). The complete Universe of in its entirety time exists relatively such as a finite free space and as constant quantity of energy for what they can happen by material carriers (particles). The Whole predetermines the maximal and minimal limits (of length, time and energy) in interactions between things. The world where is absent participates in the energy of material world through the microscopic structure of matter with the form of finite, but dynamic free space.
If the Universe were not constant in a total time so as the energy is full like a constant quantity, then the change of energy in smaller time moments (between the parts) would happen with unlimited manner (in any quantity and independent from a unit of time). The energy would always be incomplete and, in its share would be constant by chance. In this case, the minimal quantity of time tmin = λmin / Vmax would not exist, neither a highest frequency fmax.
The Universe in the cosmological theory under the title "Complete or Finished Time" is self-existent, because with simple words, the Universe is present, immutable and “compact” in the limits of a longest total time - and for this reason it is real “immediately”. In other words, the full Universe exists simultaneously and the directness coincides with inwardness. The elaboration of this ostensibly absurd and contradictory idea lead us to incredibly reasonable consequences and OPENS the WAY FOR the CONNECTION of PHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY WITH OTHER SCIENCES !
What does say this theory ?