Illusions and ignorance... without search of meaning of life

The preceding thoughts were some of the first thoughts that the author once began to investigate. The need and struggle for survival is not the whole truth to explain human behavior. The author once chose to continue his life to react to such a global lie and to the degradation of this ignorance. The intellectual effort — writings, even the cosmological theory — was persistent to prove: 1) The choice of an illusion and the ignorance of those who do not investigate impartially and rationally. 2) The human need to elude a purposeless life that is derived from such a misleading mind, and that is why humans behave selfishly and they are seduced. The human mind is lost in information and creates the psychological need for a purpose in life and to reveal its value. If people realize that they exist without a purpose, then they are anxious, and everyone is looking for a solution. People with this existential need behave selfishly and look for enjoyment of brief successes. This ignorance (that the world is more unknown and how long we will live) motivates people into unnecessary and selfish action, with ridiculous and tragic consequences for all. People with the degradation of their ignorance and high expectations of their self-centered actions are dragged like leaves in the wind from their occasional experiences and maintain their illusions. They easily think that spiritual quest is a waste of time, and they avoid thinking about the truths that disappoint them in order to justify their anti-spiritual and dreamy life. Spiritual cultivation and the inner direction of life are degraded or also limited to their selfish struggle. But even many of the answers to generalized questions about the purpose of life and the beginning of the world were not the most difficult. Those who hastily said the opposite:

They repeated one of many easily disseminated opinions without thinking, and the last thing they were interested in was inquiring.

They were lying or downplaying such a philosophical effort.

They were looking for answers occasionally, with prejudices, with an illusion of sufficient knowledge, and without rules of reasoning.

crosshairs

There are convincing answers

with rational thoughts,

without the phrases being confused with things,

observing the common experience,

with the necessary explanations,

without introducing unexplained phenomena,

without useless information but

with more details for the most demanding readers.

Most truths and knowledge that are necessary for us to live with control of our mind and awareness of reality (and not with all the flaws of a deceived, baby-minded, gullible, and impressed man) are among the simplest. There are simple, logical, and universal truths that no one wants to think about, and many people despise them. Because these rational thoughts look so simpleminded and because sciences are degraded, which are supposed to be for the smartest people, for successful professionals, and those with high expectations. The imaginary usefulness of sciences for personal life is degraded with simple thoughts, with rules of logic, and with a few common observations and common vocabulary; while their realistic usefulness is revealed, mainly for the entertainment and any cooperation of people. This is an important reason why many who have invested in the exploitation of science (with money, studies, and hopes for their future) are annoyed. If here, a lot are written and are tedious for the human mind; it happens because the educated and impressed people have overestimated their knowledge and need a Science to be convinced of their overestimation. The fables of a religion and its absurdities are more obvious. Religions can be easily challenged, and if many people still follow them, the explanation is also not the credibility of religion but the high expectations and the resistance of those who take advantage of them. Many others have specialized in scientific fields that are not disputed, but persons are not as reliable as books. Trainees and experts also have expectations and dependencies in their lives that impede their sincere view, and, together with their knowledge, they serve political and professional expediency. Scientists and experts are also not limited to what they have learned and easily indicate the sign of their specialty to emphasize their credibility. Some know better and more about an issue and appear with full certainty and comfort. A doubt will be reasonable when we really do not know from our own research and ask us to trust (those who teach that we have to get certainty after research, but they mean the research of others ...)

The simplest and most important truths do not need development of all sciences, and people need a science to be convinced of this. Many people expect to learn all the answers with affirmative sentences and aiming for every question. They have not realized that there are many questions that are revealing about the lack of knowledge and the illusions caused by habit and recklessness. Many questions in themselves are revealing of reality and of many prejudices. Don't wait for the final answers in order to live in reality and to be free from lies. Don't wait for the name of a researcher to be given to the billions of stars that are still being mapped in order to think about the most likely answers to important questions. Ask for certainty with your own thinking and not with blind confidence in people or in majority views, and try to separate the world from your imagination. We do not need more knowledge and information to have better knowledge. We need ability of thinking so as to distinguish whether we have certain knowledge or if we have questionable thoughts and information and fantasies. Reading pages with thoughts of what human thought, truth, knowledge, credibility, and faith are and how the human mind is more imagined than knows is the necessary introduction for our ability to think. It is necessary for those who want to have their own way of appreciating the percentage of credibility for all what they hear and read. Remember, persuasive answers take time, require more annoying and boring thinking, and possibly some educational preparation. Short answers are often unconvincing unless we blindly trust the person or because we know that we will receive the same response from independent researchers and teachers.

	The misleading experience and information
	On the pages of the Cosmonomy, you will not read collected and transferred information here. You will not be informed about the research of others, no lessons will be repeated, you will not be informed of events, and you will not read scattered views as everyone expresses in a discussion. But the issues that emerge bring results directly to our views and our evaluations, our choices, our ability to have knowledge and not illusions, and more widely in our behavior. Fundamental thoughts give a moral purpose to knowledge so that it is not random information, pointless knowledge, and endless verbiage. The misleading of the human mind, but also the illusion, is not only a consequence of some mistake and a lack of knowledge. Therefore, misleading is not avoided by the best memory, with the highest index of intelligence, the common rules of logic, and the best knowledge. It needs another intellectual ability that most people ignore, or such an ability has been degraded for reasons that are explained morally and psychologically. In other words, the feasibility and utility of knowledge and information are two intellectual characteristics that can coexist with the credibility of the latter. But the feasibility and utility can harm the credibility; they can divert the thinking from a demanded truth and the rational priority of thinking. Reliability and truth not only do not prevent fallacy, but on the contrary, they can achieve it with excellent thinking capacity and with a high educational level.