Knowledge and information for no purpose or for what purpose?
Once we have introduced the concept of purpose of research and knowledge into our research then immediately and perhaps unnoticed, we
remove information and research fields that would peculate our time and mind. Thought then is not limited to describing and
justifying particular phenomena, learning and memorizing and accomplishing some results. Thus knowledge and information by removing and
degrading information are revealed as being dependent on the purpose of the research, that is, with thinking about the desired or
selected results. The purpose of the research and the intended outcome are determine (as causes in thought) how and what we to think, what
information we will use and what we will know. Even the accidental choice of a thing for research is a biased choice, in the sense
that we distinguish it from other things, either consciously for known reasons or without this intent.
It has been said that seeking
knowledge influenced by desires and feelings or aiming at certain rewards does not show impartiality and desire for truth. If we prioritize our pursuits, if we
think influenced by our intuition and emotions, and if we seek a goal and some profit is not necessarily contrary to the search for truth. Not only partiality
does not always opposite to the truth and research, but it can also be in favor of truth and successful research. The truth serves even the liar and swindler
and invisibly serves trained swindlers. Impartiality (in the sense of paid research or in the sense of random search) is not always as useful as one would
expect. In many cases, if one tries to think impartially about specific issues of a certain research field and without any profit, then it is not excluded that the other who
thought unilaterally and unfairly and even with bad intentions will overcome the first impartial researcher! But luck is not also
missing from an intellectual effort to learn and to research. Simple information about a cultural event or a television training show
may offer the opportunity to think of something important for our efforts. We find again that the results in the real world are more complex. Recognizing a
small error can offer the opportunity to observe an even bigger mistake and review many of our thoughts. Those who have been trained to think exclusively with the information they have
learned degrade the complex effect on the mental and cognitive process as also the indeterminacy of human
thinking (for obvious reasons).
Imagination and generalization
are inevitable in our language
One of
the important moments of rational research for the purpose of research is the discovery that information abstraction and imagination have already begun by
the time we express thoughts in our own language. Thoughts are abstract, concise and focused concepts even when thoughts are formulated correctly and
phenomena are correctly described. Not included all information about described or justified phenomena is in the thoughts. We readily notice this lack of
knowledge and overlap of imagination when we try to think our own thoughts and express them more carefully. Things are always more than we estimate, they have
more ways of connecting, changes occur that are not always visible and all are affected in their own narrow environment.
What is the end result?
knowledge and
deception |
- |
Thinking about an end result and end goal of thought and action immediately reveals a problem of ignorance
>>>
|