*

THE COMPLETE COSMOS, MATTER & WAVE PHENOMENA

 

For creatively thinking!

 

 

right curve

 

our planet

left curve

 

right curve

star

  INTRO PAGE


Gr language  Eng lang

 

???

(

BIG QUESTIONS - SHORT ANSWERS !

)

 

 

<•> The question about the limits and unity of world, in brevity

 

The first official publication in 2000 year

~ Many years ago: Do you said that don't exist eternal truths for the nature? The first universal relations constitute world axioms, certain clauses with mathematic consequence, that predetermine the undeniably foundations not only of cosmology* but for each science. Universal limits and traits for all things exist and if we ignore them, then our knowledge for the different things reveals these things more different and with possibilities that don't have. If we know the common traits of things and the physical laws, thus disappear cer­tain foolish queries, even some theories that have bet in the precision of certain mathematic calculations. Certain of these relations have extracted and enumerated with a priori­ty (without care here, in order to they are corrected or supplemented and without comments).

 

 

EXTRACTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL BOOK " THE THEOLOGY OF SCIENCE"

ISBN 960-385-019-5 ©2000   (in GR publication)

Attention! They exist translational errors.

" Each part of the Universe isn't the total from the all moments (of time) and with this definition, the part exists always (perforce) in a partial moment and not in an other (moment of time) " .1

" Things are direct parts of the same reality and constitute a common Total " .2

" Things have relations each one with the other, that is to say they interact and influenced between them " .3

" Things interact immediately and indirectly, in different and in the same moments, with a lot of different ways " .4

" The causes and results are themselves the things and their behavior. (...) 5 Each part of reality is a cause not common for all results and simultaneously a result not common for the all causes and interact with residual parts " .6

" The relation or connection of the part with the total reality is not only indirect and external " .7

" Each part of reality always differs immediately from its totality… " .8

" Two things without nothing common (element) in their quality or in their relations with the other things, would be utterly extraneous, utterly irrelevant and without some possibility for direct or indirect influence " .9

" When we say that the things are dependent between them, we mean, that they are influenced permanently what and how are, from what are and from the ways, that are the remainder things or some of these " .10

" There that exists an interaction, they exist always the common traits of the cause and result " .11

" The results of a cause are not these of an other cause and we find some causes, that are irrelevant from certain results or they have a faraway indirect relation, which they could to not have. As we say, they exist combined a lot of causality chains " .12

" The same cause on different things cannot has precisely or all same consequences, while in direct or indirect relation with some other causes is possible to determine differently or opposite results. The same cause can to determines a different result and the same result to is determined by a different cause… " .13

" In reality, each part influences and modifies the rests, however not everything (all parts), in the same moment " .14

" Influences are continued with some ways that are not stable determined (immutably), causing changes in the quality, activity and interaction of the intermediate things and thus they exist results, which are not determined regularly by one and the same cause. In other words, they are materialized or exist results, for which certain of the causes have ceased exist or to determine them and reversely: They exist causes that don't constitute the alone or first beginning for the existence of certain results and however, these contribute or are useful for the existence of these results, even when these causes are not exist" .15

"The so-called indetermination or luck, in reality is the unstable determination, (a changing determination), which is explained from the indirect (and relative) contribution that have each other the connected parts of reality " .16

" No one thing, which isn't the sufficient cause to itself can not be the alone cause for the existence or quality of another (...) However, it can't to be not a cause or to be not produces result… " .17

" The alone (or sufficient) cause (...) which does not have an other cause except itself, contrary to the partly causes, it is the perfect total of them (consequently, it is also these things together) ".18

" The same things are certain causes for themselves, because their existence is a part of one and same selfed-determine quality and not only an external part and for this reason, they are specified not only indirectly - externally. Their sufficient cause is not an external fundamental nor an external final cause, it is their direct total, in which are parts immediately (without any mediation)" .19

" To exists interaction (or difference in time), it should exist things which aren't the sufficient cause for self " .20

" Each thing, externally unto other things and independently from the moment in which it exists, it can be considered as a partial result, in the realization of which they have contributed indirectly (without a beginning) all remainder things as certain causes " .21

" Independently from the moment in which each thing begins to exists, it has been influenced more indirectly by each other thing and this has affected (influence) indirectly every other " .22

" The all things constitute a constant Total inside in limits of a time, they aren't numberless, they do not interact with unlimited ways and the most indirect way with which each thing influences the other isn't infinite " .23

" The most indirect ways of interaction are these that have become since always (without a beginning). (...) What are these more indirect results, which always are specified in the quality of each thing? As it will be proved, these common elements are the common ways of interaction, which are named "matter" " .24

" The results from the most indirect interaction of things are the things with less interactions (...) 25 they constitute the stabilised ways of influence, that we name matter. (...) 26 The material elements are the stabilised ways, with which the Universe always has become in its minimal moment and, in the abstract reality, these material constitute the most simple qualities (of things) " .27

"The most indirect way by which a thing influences each other after a time interval and through the all other parts should be a common way and constantly the same way, and never to exists always an other way more indirect" .28

" The reality in its entirety of Time is finished (before the relative moment in which its parts are exist as externally) and for this reason, they aren't only the things of previous moments that influence the things in the next moments, but also reversely… " .29

" The substance is the fixed and uncreated beginning for relative things and this does not mean, that the substance is the rest from the abstraction of each change and action. From a such substance would be absent the quality and complexness. Not only without the substance they can't exist relations, changes, possibilities, but also without the last ones it can not exists the substance as the first - common source " .30

" The material elements are the ways by which the Universal Quality begins relatively to becomes indirectly in its minimal moment " .31

" The different composite qualities can not be explained only from certain common and external substances for the same reason, that could not be explained the existence of differences in initial common (and simple) entities/substances " .32

" The part, such as theoretical and abstract is always this itself, it is always a part, but its ceaseless change means that it is not precisely this same and without quality (nowise). The concept of change and time presuppose, that this part is changing partly and isn't only one or simple " .33

" Things are exist as limited, they are such as are in reference to others. They have their existence with mediatory existence of many other things and with their connection in a environment, necessarily of the physical laws. With this concept was used the phrase "in­direct existence or things". The indirect and separate their existence presup­poses a lack of directness, time and a lack of substance. (...) All things are direct the same common substance and with this are connected immediately, simultaneously (...) If the total of things wasn't a direct cause for its self, if it wasn't with a stabilised quality (like a total Time), then the said things would not constitute some ways of a common sub­stance (...) and they couldn't be with a relatively constant and unified quality, nor to have some common traits " .34*  ".

 

The Theology of Science, ©2000, ISBN 960-385-019-5 

(1) page108, (2) page114, (3) page113, (4) page124, (5) page124, (6) page130, (7) page109, (8) page109, (9) page110, (10) page111, (11) page124, (12) page124, (13) page127, (14) page127, (15) page128, (16) page131, (17) page129, (18) page129-130, (19) page130, (20) page133, (21) page128, (22) page140, (23) page139, (24) page129, (25) page141, (26) page140, (27) page158, (28) page161, (29) page157, (30) page143, (31) page141, (32) page137, (33) page110, (34) page144-145

 

In the fundamental thoughts that are enumerated with a selected sequence (thread) expressed with some vagueness (no however ambiguously) the most abstract concepts (nearby in Aristotle's categories), such as particularly is the concept of the part, total and rela­tion. The description for the cosmos as a totality and as a part imposes the concept (sig­nificance) about the relation and quantity. The union of concept of a totality with the con­cept of time imposes the concept about the change and dynamic relation between the parts. Then it is imposed to are determined the relations of resemblance, identity and dif­ference between the part and totality. These first relations as were worded have mathe­matic prospect, such as in the mathematics is the relation of the unit with itself unit and such as the division or multiplication of the unit imposes the concept about the quantity and proportion. The vagueness is a exchange for the generalization. However, it does not cancels the manifold importance of the universal concepts, when undeniably they are reported in an unspecified multitude of things and phenomena and not in our fantasies.

In those years, in order to I avoid the rejection of dogmatic thinking and every thoughtless people, who believe that can beforehand to appreciate without need to hear or read, the following footnote was written with the first general thoughts: " The abstract concepts about thing and part are used with the unspecified broadness of an unknown x, which corresponds in a limit of possible solutions, by which a big part is considered known and real. Through the interconnection of their concepts in the develop­ment of the cogitation, then will clarified their limits and importance ".

 

(

 

)

 

(

 

 

)

 

• If we meet so much thoughtlessness, lack of ideas, unconcern for clues, long-lasting tolerance in biases, cowardice for our expression, discri­minatory application of knowledge with psychological and econo­mically motives and bureaucratic mentality, if we meet all these in persons that teach sciences and in researchers: Then, we should think more beyond limits of this question (about the role and reliability in Science), how many more ineffectual and unreliable is the human thinking for problems of life and society!

If an opinion of a madman

is correct, then it is correct. Don't downgraded and inva­lidated it in order to we select to hear the same thought from a celebrated person and with some ceremo­nious preparation, or becau­se we want a frame with narra­tions for the curi­ous people and some his­torical remembrance

 

(

 

 

)

 

mini bang!

WHY THE CENTRAL IDEA OF THE "BIG BANG" THEORY IS THE BIGGEST FOOLISHNESS IN SCIENCE !  READ HERE

www.cosmonomy.eu

ENTRY FOR PHYSICISTS

Interpretation & Math investigation

 

 

back next

SHORT ANSWERS - BIG SURPRISES !

 

 

κοσμολογία, cosmology, in German: Kosmologie, in Italian and Portuguese: cosmologia, in France: cosmologie, in Spanish: cosmología, in Russian: космология, in Chinese: 宇宙论, in Hindi: ब्रह्मांड विज्ञान (), in Turkish: kozmoloji, in Swedish and Norwegian: kosmologi, in Arabic: الكوزمولوجيا علم الكونيات , in Hebrew: קוסמולוגיה

φιλοσοφία, philosophy, in German: Philosophie, in Italian and Portuguese: filosofia, in France: philosophie, in Spanish: filosofía, in Russian: философию, in Chinese: 哲学, in Hindi: दर्शन (tattvadnyaan), in Turkish: felsefe, in Swedish and Norwegian: filosofi, in Arabic: الفلسفة , in Hebrew: פילוסופיה

 on 2021-06-27.

 

© Konstant G. Nikol

Edit & Design 2004 - 2014  |  All rights reserved

Best view at 1024x768px | screen 17"minimum | IE v.6.0 +