THE THEOLOGY OF SCIENCE. WHAT IS IT ?
What I had written about this book in Greek
The title " Theology of Science" implies some opposition to the religion. It still expresses a reaction in the bias, that the Science is not involved with Theological and Philosophical questions. The term "Theology" it remains because the Existence of God is not rejected. On the contrary, as somehow the title implies, the existence of God becomes acceptable after a rational approach and new determination of the significance about God, through the formation of a cosmological theory. From an other view, it is implied that the Science with the Theology do not have perfectly otherwise or irrelevant fields of search.
Clarification: Any concrete religion or philosophical theory of past does not acceptable and constitute a base. The writer and theorist of this work accepts more easily they characterize him " atheist " than to he gets involved in religious juxtapositions and does not want religious or antireligious reactions. (Cf. more in the page Religion & Reliability).
In that book - where was published in limited number of
copies in 2000 (Dodoni publications, ISBN 960-385-019-5, number of pages 448)
-, a persistent attempt has been made to answered the big questions of Philosophy in concise manner and as
questions of an overall issue, avoiding ready-made thoughts or previous theories. A
multitude of random and fragmentary observations in
the experience and a multitude of separate explanations can result more fast, more easily and not accidentally.
They can, through the theoretical analysis of some concepts and correlation of few general notions and with our possibility we know all things
through observation of some relations and resemblances in the nearest and most usual things of our experience. This view I aimed to prove with the book "Theology of Science" and
I became tedious and little comprehensible. With multiannual, daily and unselfish search, without an advantage that the computer offers and without the briefing from the
In that book, an original cosmological theory was published for first time complicated with tedious analyses of meanings and with a lot of ambiguities. This theory on the beginning of the Universe comes contrary to sovereign theory of the “Big Explosion” and brings aptly the special title “Theory of Finished (Total) Time and Relativity of Energy ”. More briefly - but with some inaccuracy I call it " Theory of a Simultaneous Universe ". It is a bold theory, that explains and describes unified the existence of matter and relation between time, space and with the appearance of Life. This theory, with usual and daily vocabulary achieves to enters in scientific questions creatively which they are presented in physics from a different course.
In parallel with the cosmological theory was attempted answers in the two other central and direct related questions of Philosophy. The formation of views about the meaning of knowledge and on the verification of its reliability led to the concise formulation of an introductive theory on the knowledge, generally. This theory explains the relation of intellect with senses and the possibility of knowledge beyond our most direct personal experience. (I call it also, Theory of Abstraction).
I call this theory "of Abstraction" because as I explain, the intellect makes abstraction of traits from pictures (impulsively) and creates the notion of words not only with conscious and reasonable way. The abstraction of traits and the summary view of things begin from data of senses and this process
shows, that senses are intellectual activity with "raw material" outside of intellect. First data of our senses already are extracted traits of things and pictures constitute short views of them!
Finally, the search round the question of destination of Life and about human behavior led in cogitations for the formulation of a moral Theory of Mental and Inner Orientation, such as I have call this theory.
Our time is limited and precious. If you do not like brainteasers or have not free time, read the best-aimed and interesting lines of the book. Skip lines and thoughts which are vague, obscure, uninterested and meticulous. If we take into consideration, how we are exhausting our mind in order to understand and retain thoughts from novels, about ephemeral questions and insignificant things, then we will not find so much obscure this theoretical approach. The imperfections and ambiguity that characterizes the philosophical questions should not overshadow the main thoughts and originality of this meditative effort. Moreover, if we think, that the book orientates us to diachronically and "anywhere" questions and explains us, the close relation among the Universe with time and Life, then we will not demand this book is more comprehensible than a school book. Soon, when they will need to describe and explain the beginning and substance of things in science with the simpler expressions, concisely, without mathematics and magical dimensions, then they will not find better-aimed and quick way to do.*
Since ancient times up today, many thinkers and philosophers with their important works reacted to biases, foolishness, frivolity and human egocentricity with the most brilliant and powerful thinking. They were approached wanting truths, placed a brake in unilateral opinions and extremities of thinking, highlighted the wealth of human spirit and defended a philosophical way of life. I feel to express my admiration and optimism and together my sorrow for those who, it did not happen or I could not study until now, still.
My excessive optimism about the possibility of knowledge does not aim in appointment of my own thoughts and it does not come with ignorance of the efforts that has happen of many other thinkers and in science. On the contrary, it comes from long formation of my thoughts, which began in young age, when my educational level was still incredibly discouraging and I did not expect this possibility of human thinking. With this expression again, I do not want to say that my own intellect achieved approaches close to the asked big answers, but that this possibility existed in human from more ancient times. I consider very important this fact, that Philosophy exists historical. Even more, given that the human thought in Philosophy achieved enormous jumps and reached almost in the all likely solutions of theoretical problems.
I thank you and I wish you to find satisfactory answers and if no these, then my own work to constitutes a source for inspiration and encouragement for your own efforts!
©2000, ISBN 960-385-019-5
It does not exist prospect re-print !
only in Gr language
THE SCIENCE WILL REACH IN ITS OWN THEOLOGY
Go to Top