HOME • UP • Senses are intellectual processes

 

 Easy generalization with philosophical thinking

Some universal relations and concepts for the cosmology

 

ISBN 960-385-019-5~ Some decades ago: The cosmological theory of a complete and simultaneous universe (ie, theory of the Completed Time) before the mathematical investigation (2008) was limited to the most common observations and was formulated with the more general notions such as time, space, movement and change, matter, whole, part, relation, effect ... etc. As a philosophical theory of earlier times, it began with the monistic view of reality and rationally, but the general relations and traits of things which were observed were correct and enhanced the survey. This abstract description of a common reality gives a cohesive (unified) and rational concept of the cosmos, temporarily leaving out of thought all individual differences (otherness) and particularities of visible things. The common features of the cosmos and the cosmos as a common Whole were chosen to explain inequalities, differences, peculiarities, differences of separate things, and the existence of their boundaries. It is unbelievable that through thoughts, with usual vocabulary and observing thoughts in thinking, without calculations and experiments, certain successive thoughts emerge that give answers to issues that have been deemed to be extremely difficult! The following extracts from the earlier wording of the cosmological theory1 has no other purpose than to confirm this finding with the undisputed fact and to make known some important remarks, as they were formulated before the mathematical investigation which started late after many years.

 

" It is impossible for a thing to exist without time or reversely, because time is the thing itself with its changes and with its interactions. When we say that a thing does not exist in time, with this expression we should mean that the thing does not change or that it is perfectly stabilized. But what is not found within time, does not exist in the Universe…”. (p. 147) 

" The past and the future - which we perceive as parts among other parts - constitute the present (the wider now ) of the 100% Universe”. (p. 155)

" If the reality were not complete (beforehand) or in previous moments, before even the moment it is realized for us, then a free space would not ex­ist” and with a limit in distance. (p. 169-170, 273)

" The free space is the a priori realization in the all possible ways of all those that can be realized relatively a posteriori (ex post facto) with the car­riers of the indirect interaction (structural elements) and exists as the ener­gy for the possibility of what is realized by the structural elements”. (p. 171)

" The free space is the energy of time in its entirety” where the Universe is complete. (p. 180)

" Every beginning in space is realized relatively a posteriori (relatively ex post facto) with the carriers of the indirect interaction (structural ele­ments) and the beginning of the existence of these structural elements is found outside space, that is to say, it is direct and is realized in distance smaller than a minimal length, by the Universe that exists in the remaining sub-moments, while it does not exist relatively. (...) The possibility of direc­tion, is the possibility of interaction of a lot of elements at a common mo­ment or in the most direct way. It exists as a free space, because it is in ad­vance the direct existence and interaction of things in all the possible ways inside the limits of a maximum common moment” . (p. 172, 173) 

" The distance in the free space is distance in time and reversely” (p. 174) 

" A thing moves in the free space because it is influenced without its parts moving towards each other and more generally, because the modes with which its elements are influenced by each other are not destabilized”. (p. 176) 

" The things which exist as indirect, are some modes of change, of mo­tion and distance in space, from the beginning of their existence, indepen­dently of their relation with the other (external) things in space (...) They have always a flow because they are modes in the total energy of the free space… that does not depend on the other relative and indirect movements realized in various distances of space. This is similar to the fact that the quality of a thing in its entirety is not determined only indirectly by exterior effects” . (p. 178) 

" The relative beginning of the material reality and time is realized by the simultaneous (balanced) energy of the free space”.  (p. 180)  

" The free space and material reality are never absent, as long as the material reality corresponds to moments of decrement of its energy (of the free space). Similarly, the lack of energy of the free space did not begin at some moment in time and is never compensated in its entirety” . (p. 183) 

" The decrease of energy is a moment of its transfer...” (p. 185) 

" The change or flow of energy and the interaction presuppose a decre­ment of energy, as the flow of time and the moments presuppose the change and a lack of time” . (p 150) 

" Because the energy cannot be transferred more immediately than a lim­it, for this reason the decrement of energy cannot be continued without limit at the same moment” . (p. 183) 

" The initial decrements of the energy, that is to say the initial time mo­ments of the total time, are the common ways of influence between the indi­rect things (...), which are named radiations and become perceptible as heat, light and sound” (p183-184)

" The material elements are the ways, with which the Universe begins to be realized relatively and indirectly (as a quality) at its minimal moment” . (p. 141) 

" Now, we can say in other terms, that the quantity of the material carri­ers (the particles, the structural elements) and the wider indirect reality ex­ist, because the decrement of energy is not continued without limit for the same moment (it is not a decrement of the total energy)” . (p. 183) 

" The most direct way of transfer of energy is not simply a limit, which a solid material body cannot exceed in retrospect. It is the limit of time under which the directness and the stability of the (full) Universe are interrupted and is presented as exterior - indirect energy or as material interaction. The interaction of the structural elements, their interconnection and the indirect relation between them presuppose that they are not affected in the most di­rect way (one from other) and on the contrary, that they interact after greater time intervals and with less energy. The interactions of matter and the indirect complex reality exist relatively as a loss of time and decrement of energy from the simultaneous (balanced) total energy, that constitutes the free space” . (p. 185)  

" The empty (free) space is the energy in the entirety of time, while a minimal energy and a minimal distance correspond to the minimal time” . (p. 186) 

" The material nature exists and is realized with the beginning of low speeds, slower time limits in the interactions, while the complete Universe is simultaneously... " (p. 187) 

" The big error in the development of the science of physics emerges more clearly than ever in the end of the twentieth century and is formulated very simply: It tries to explain and create theoretically the essential traits of the Universe and this Universe itself with the (absolute) zero. While on the contrary, it would be supposed, that they begin from the complete (perfect) Total, from the common preexisting entity, from the finished time (like one solid thing), in order to explain how the traits and the things are created such as separate parts (and externally) by a relative zero (by the empty space). Our own big question is the reverse. How the indirect relations (of many individual things) and the multiplicity are relatively created and main­tained by the initial unit and directness” . (p. 187) 

" It is unthinkable to name "Universe” the total of things until a limit in time (or in space) and beyond that limit, to consider it as being outside the Universe” . (p. 318) 

" Time, Universe and space do not exist without matter, that is to say a Universe only immediately, without quality, in other words a total moment without the smaller moments, as fundamental elements, which compose ex­ternally the full Universe, also do not exist. Consequently, with the empiric terminology, the Universe is the total energy, without it meaning that a lack of energy does not exist. Exactly this relative lack gives its meaning and makes it identical with time, that is to say with the change and effect. The total energy is the free space and compensates its deficiencies, that are the material world”. (p. 188) 

" the differences in substance, namely matter (structural elements), are some moments in the transfer of energy, moments when its flow begins and finishes, that is to say are moments of decrement and compensation”. (p. 188) 

" The total and simultaneous energy that corresponds to the free space is constant and limited, while in no moment is the material reality absent, that corresponds to smaller moments of its decrease (on the total energy)” . (p. 189) 

“ The first-fixed possibilities of spatial energy from which the structural elements originate and the most common natural phenomena can be ex­pressed as changes of a fluid (and dimensionless) medium: decrease, flow, time of flow and a level, limit to flow quantity, limit to decrease, counterbal­ance, time of counterbalance, limit to counterbalance, iteration, time of re­peat, a limit to repeat, interaction, time of interaction, etc” .(p. 181) 

" The common energy (of the free space) exists as a flow to them (to the materially-indirect things), which we perceive as gravity or as attraction between the things” . (p. 190) 

" Because all the things and also the material carriers, with which these are realized, are modes of interaction and moments in the total energy, so the things do not differ in substance and exist equally immediately and si­multaneously. Consequently, the energy of the free space influences all things,* independently from their quality (or independently from the mode and time in which the things exist as indirect) and independently from their external distance”. (p. 190) 
(* That is to say, independently from their chemical composition, as it is known) 

" When the indirect interactions are realized in more direct ways, then the structural carriers (particles) are connected in smaller distances, in more directions and they are assembled in smaller area”. (p. 191) 

" When the energy flow of free space towards a number of structural car­riers (particles) becomes greater (is increased), then the time and space, in which the indirect interactions are realized, is more limited and the possible modes of indirect interaction between them are proportionally limited”. (p. 191) 

" The cause of concentration of material quantities is the flow for coun­terbalance of the decreases” of the (total) energy, add. (p. 198) 

" Annihilation of distance means lack of time difference and of every in­teraction”. (p. 193-194) 

" The longest distance is common for all things. No area of space is a limit of common concentration, common limit for ending or beginning. Thus, the concentration is neither around a common centre nor towards a common direction and is altered perpetually, but the longest distance re­mains always the same”. (p. 198) 

" The carriers of indirect interaction and configuration of things, the so-called matter are the things with the less simultaneous modes of interaction. That is to say, they are a relative lack of quality and reality in the total of reality and they cannot be influenced by a lot of different things at the same moment (or with a lot of ways at the same moment)”. (p. 203-204) 

" The existence of common (outer) time for a lot of things and changes and the existence of the free space them­selves show the insufficiency of the Theory of Special Relativity, because if the relativity of time were not rela­tive too, then the stability and the continuity of things would be inexplicable and accidental phenomena”. (p. 320) 

" A maximum time limit, the Universal Moment, exists, which cannot be divided without limit, thus also a minimal moment exists, by which limits in the indirect (material) interactions and in the things are predetermined tem­porally, that exist as modes of interaction (in the common substance) and thus they have a direct relation with time (...) All things should change by such modes that the Quality of the Universe is always maintained. We should not speak of the law of conservation of energy or matter (that is to say, of an abstract reality), but of the more well-aimed law of the Finished Time (Stable Maximum Period)”. (p. 269) 

" Matter is reality with its most abstract quality, it is the relative first re­ality in the qualitative total of reality and it does not exist without the total of things or before every quality of things. Matter without a previous quality of things or without its previous configuration in qualities, would be simple matter forever and every element would interact as unspecified, without time limits and without any constant attribute or predetermined limit to the modes of reaction”. (p. 292) 

" If the reality as a total were not immediately by itself as an independent and self-determined existence, then the stability, the unity and quality in the material - external activity and consequently every mental development in time would be impossible”. (p. 388) 

" The possibility for the things to exist, that is, to constitute composite qualities, to be combined and to maintain constant modes of interaction, to be directly (or simultaneously) for themselves, while they are parts indirect­ly (and in different time), presupposes the stability and directness of the to­tal”. ( p. 241)

" The things with their quality are always the quality of direct and com­mon reality that exists always within the limits of a maximum time, while it continues to be relatively realized as indirect at relatively smaller moments”. (p. 265)  

This following quote seemed to be totally empty of meaning: " When the decrease of energy is minimal, then a minimal amount of en­ergy is transmitted in a shorter time…, while the remaining energy remains simultaneously as the maximum quantity towards the minimal energy (...)”. (p. 183) 

However, the immediately following wording of the previous proportion in the term of frequency f is understandable and simple, although it is simi­larly general yet:

fup = f02 / f   and  f = f02 / fup

or this proportion in mass quantity: Mmax = c · M / Vm

 

> An example of rational thought that goes into a field of modern science: "Matter without the prior existence of a complex reality could have no struc­ture and a relatively stabilized presence." In the special terms of physics and according to experience "the prior complex reality" participates as a free space, while matter and its dynamic structure is interpreted as e / m fluctuations in the balanced energy of the space.

 

How would you react and what would you say, if you attempted to offer help to a likable fellow man, who was need but in order to accept your help, puts the following terms:

You will come at a certain time, will push the bell only once, will speak without tangling your tongue, will fill out a form, describe and enumerate clearly your offer and will sign it. In a similar way the bureaucracy of many scientists (with their collaborations), prevents the theoretical research, discourages the effort from independent researchers and intellectual authors; while it encourages certain researchers and co-workers selectively, according to the financial, advertising and collaborating profits. So the research is hampered, because some professionals need to gain time and do not have interest to think more in order to correct a few mistakes. In such a way, the research is hampered, because some people are concerned about their serious profile that will possibly be defaced and their credibility that will be questioned. So the research is impeded, because some people are afraid to share their thoughts, and because independent works are not written in the required terms, or in a way with which they are not familiar or because the works have been written without the level of education that they consider to be necessary for the overall appearance of their work. And some scientists of them consider this phobia or crankiness of theirs to be courage and efficacy, in order to protect ostensibly science from the unskilled people!

 


1  The Theology of Science, ©2000, ISBN 960-385-019-5, pages 448

 

 

 

ΠΙΣΩ            ΕΠΟΜΕΝΗ ΣΕΛΙΔΑ

 

 

 

Go to Top