|
|
ARISTOTLE | ARISTOTLE AND PLATO'S COSMOLOGY | EPICURUS | STOICS | PHILOSOPHY IN BHAGAVAD-GITA | ERIUGENA | ARAB PHILOSOPHERS | BACON F | DESCARTES | SPINOZA | LOCKE | LEIBNITZ | BERKELEY | HUME | KANT | FICHTE | SCHELLING | HEGEL | SCHOPENHAUER | ENGELS | L. BUCHNER | HAECKEL | HUSSERL | EINSTEIN | HEIDEGGER | T. de CHARDIN | AGNOSTICISM
> Quick retrospection and annotation in philosophical efforts from ancient times until now <
If somebody reader is informed about the main thoughts of a philosopher from a summary -of a philosophical dictionary or encyclopedia and some other brief references- unfortunately nothing will understand. Rather, reader will conceive a warped until an irrelevant view of theory that the same philosopher has thoroughly formulate it. Often, we writers -particularly professors that teach the history and subsections of philosophy- consider selectively some thoughts, if these appertain to popular questions that we consider as staple and firmly questions in Philosophy. Thinkers and philosophers perhaps did not consider these questions so much significantly and decisive and in first priority. They approached to their thoughts from a peculiar and extraordinary thinking and through different experiences even to the most ordinary questions. They formulated their theories with different concerns and not as seem from the final wording and completion of their essays. Philosophers have expressed rational thoughts and key-observations, inferences and concepts which we remove or misquote and differently interpret them -selectively in many cases- in order to we summarize and understand their theories.
|