14. Cosmonomy: Sciences are separated but natural laws are inseparable and synchronously be implement...

But even if we think that the fields of research are completely different, then again we will need to explain (empirical observations) how life appears along with natural phenomena and think about how particular characteristics of a biological body and its psychology depend from details of matter and natural phe­nomena and on natural processes. Conversely, when life appears, then natural phenomena do not remain the same and independent of biological functions. With the advent of life, the world also appears different and dependent on the observer's biological body. The world would be nothing more than an inexhaustible collection of forms and inanimate bodies if there were no biological body in which information is caused by the actions of things, which it utilizes for its needs. Things are not created and are not related to separate relations of physics, chemistry, biology, astro­nomy and as we divide the fields of research according to human needs and choices. On the contrary, relations described and explained in these separate sciences are selected observations from complete world and presented separately and with new vocabulary to facilitate human memory, manage infor­mation, and transmit information. Reality not only does not appear so divided as the sciences have been divided, but all the descriptions and subdivisions of the books are not the forced path from which the observations and discoveries in the real world follow. A construction that we did without first studying a design, can then be presented with a design and a guidebook that serve to repeat the construction. Random observations of natural phenomena can later be described in detail, and then the descriptions seem necessary to follow these random observations, that is, a normal illusion.

In both everyday life and in the field of science, we remove things and relationships from our thoughts, for simplification and priority, predicting what is more directly and more indirectly related. When we think specifically (with clear boundaries), then we have removed total reality and its possibilities, one could easily say, and we usually do so unaware of it. It is a prejudice of the most difficult to detect as it begins with the given, that reality is only matter and separate things, while on the contrary, most reality is potential, dynamic relationships and absent! With such prejudice, therefore, it is consistent in science to claim clear descriptions for everything and with absolute precision and to seek clear causes. The relationships of the parties, the potential ways to interact, the ways and the movements with which things are maintained and linked are always a large part of reality - the greatest - which is not (directly) visible. If we think more closely we will see that behind many difficulties and disagreements are related to the general difficulty of distinguishing the cause and the result. It is not easy to determine what the cause is and to predict the result and this difficulty is revealed when we need to clearly distinguish the beginning of the cause, the most indirect effects and the contribution of many other effects and the so -called conditions. No one knows all the consequences of an action and the consequences are not only what we foresee or aim to carry out. And of course the consequences are not limited to a field of research that has been separated from others for educational purposes. The unpredictable consequences can be anywhere, in the natural or social environment and from any action in nature or by personal choices and from team efforts and by the governments of the countries. We define the causes and results within the boundaries that convenient us and our theories to avoid impassioned effort and waste of time. Same as ... we close our eyes to the simple terrible truth about the uncertainty of our existence and the certainty of its temporariness.

We know less the specific things that are considered best known than we think. We are talking about one thing and it is at the same time a combination or union of many others. We observe it from different positions and appears with minor deviations, until completely different. We use it for a result (eg a knife), but the same thing can serve for many other results and with a slight modification to be called differently. We observe its reaction or behavior next to another thing, but its reaction becomes different when approaching next to different things. We observe it with different organs and detect different content and properties. The original image that clearly informs us of one thing, quickly with little research and thought proves to be incomplete and raises questions about what and how it is. After all, a realistic man is no less dreamy than an enigmatic philosopher. The distortion that ignorance and selective knowledge causes in mind and distortion in human perception (by the limitations of sensory organs and biological body) can be summarized with the following phrase: People see and think of things that do not exist, and they do not see or think many of the things that exist ...