<•>
Certain first questions about life and the world cannot be answered as irrelevant from each other. Rational research here gives a unified answer. A
unified answer links different issues rationally, that is, with reasonable consistency, showing how they are linked and in accordance with the rules of
simple logic. From expressed thoughts about a cluster of similar issues (e.g., the
question of how we distinguish the truth and how our thinking is influenced by desires), some consequences are drawn that touch our views on many other issues (e.g.,
how much reliable is the history of events that we have learned). We are not talking about explaining a distinct and rare phenomenon. We are talking about a
large package of many answers and an interpretation from which it is revealed how a number of phenomena and many separate issues are connected. That
is, the answer to the questions is unified and not one-sided. One-sided answer = that is, a partial answer according to conjectures and by choosing
a reality detached from other characteristics and laws, if not by choosing a world of our imagination.
Let's analyze it a bit.
• Moral Response. Because without thinking about the destination of life, without appreciating the spiritual priority of life to itself, and
without regulating behavior with spiritual values, knowledge will not solve our problems. On the contrary we are living misled with knowledge but no
morality; knowledge is used for every exploitation, politics reproduces injustice, and whole societies are crazy, if not destroyed.
• Psychological response. The human soul cannot calm down without morality and without the fallacies being
removed. Morality without our thinking in a spiritual
orientation and with a life seduced by personal experience remains casual, and human logic applies discriminatorily. We still need our
awareness of our reality and weaknesses and to get rid of our fantasies with spiritual cultivation. Also, we cannot allow talking about the human
life and soul, leaving the social and political phenomena outside of our thinking. Are you talking about human life without the spiritual compass of morality and with
the dream that human life can be normal and as we plan?
• Rational Answer. Because we start with the appreciation that some truths are more obvious than some others,
and we are looking for credibility. We doubt what we cannot confirm in our own experience, we put our opinions in a series, we recognize weaknesses for full knowledge, and
we simplify our knowledge. We look for the error when the conclusions negate the original thought. We are thinking with the optimistic logic that the
world and the facts exist with laws, and all things are somehow connected and explained. Do you have knowledge without thinking and without being able
to appreciate the reliability of your information? Do you believe or refuse only according to your expectations and interests?
• Answer that is political. Because society, apart from human cooperations and controversies, needs laws that respect morality (with spiritual
orientation) and the human logic that does not conflict with natural laws. It is necessary to prevent the exploitation of human weaknesses and for
people to be protected from abuse of trust, also from thugs, whether they be simple bums or famous and in positions of power. People must
live in a society conducive to their spiritual cultivation and moral improvement. Are you talking about social problems without the spiritual
purpose of life and without the moral perspective of the state?
• Answer that is even cosmological.
Because if we ignore the physical laws and the weaknesses of man in the material world, then immature views and fantasies (such as religious ones) are
formed and on every occasion from personal and occasional experience. Everyone believes in his own god and lives in his own imaginary world. While a man
with exaggerated expectations and mad wishes behaves in an arrogant way, thoughts are trapped in the social environment and exhausted in efforts that do not
bring happiness. Generally, we are expecting from natural world research and from cosmology unambiguous answers to the questions of the principle of
Life and the existence of God, which are also inseparable from the rational ethic. Are you talking about happiness, morality, and human relationships without thinking of
natural laws, with contempt for human weaknesses, and with disdain for the great ignorance of reality? Also, we cannot rule out the usefulness of questions on knowledge and human
thinking for cosmological research and the close relationship that lifestyle has to spiritual cultivation and intellectual abilities.
* Here's a brilliant example of a unified answer from a book on a Global Ethics:
From the subversive (moral) view about the
relation of thinking and information with deception of a human life, we come to the subversive (sociological) point of view about the facilitation
and protecting for deceivers under State laws and about engaging of the State in partnerships that have no moral priority. How will we observe this
important relation (of deception) if we only focus on issues of psychology or politics alone?
* The philosophers are people with a research spirit who cannot restrict their thinking to one detached thing.
Since ancient times, they have ultimately realized that the whole world is somewhat connected to our lives, while the senses present a
world in a gradual, fragmentary, and relative way. As it was written in the philosophical book "Theology of Science," 2000 edition:
"Things are not created and linked to isolated
relations of physics, chemistry, astronomy, economics, or generally of specialized sciences". p. 338
"The limited things exist and are made with a common and immediate principle (...) and not only with abstract relations of specialized sciences"
p. 387
"If reality as a whole was not directly by itself as an independent and self-defined existence, then stability, unity, and quality would be
impossible in material-external activity and therefore would be impossible any intellectual development in time." p. 388
The credibility of the answers by the experts and the solutions to problems... for which we
often pay:
An answer or
solution may be right; however, in most cases answers are given with many hypotheses that we usually conceal. That is, we expect a
result with assumptions such as these: If we have our health. If the other family members are well in their health. If we live in the same house,
in the same area, with the same work, and with the same income. If the same friendships and partnerships are maintained. If we can find the
same things on the market and offer the same services. If the technologies we are familiar with do not change. If our acquaintances and
friends will think with the same opinions and considerations. If we do not have to pay a lot of money for an extraordinary event. If the
same government policy is implemented. If some lies do not spread against us. If the unsightly flaw on the epidermis or on our body is not
healed. If we have the same desire and patience. If our good relationship with loved ones does not spoil. If our appearance will be the
same. If the difference in age does not prevent us. If our opinion (our own or of others) does not change after better knowledge and
information.
If our love affair does not spoil. If what we usually eat is just as safe for our health.
These are a few possible assumptions that we leave out of our thoughts and discussions, and without the details of each case. While, theoretically, infinite
"if" are possible for countless conjectures that determine or change a specific result for something as unstable as a human's life in the future and within
an unbalanced society. Even the clearer
knowledge of the experts predicts the results in fantastic conditions, while the
application of knowledge in the real world does not ensure the same results. Instead, a number of consequences are produced and caused by
the contribution of all the details and all the different things, and — we don't forget — with our own decisive choices. That's why smart
predictions and wise and cautious guidelines for desired results, and the things presented as convincing, can easily be disputed and overturned by people
who ignore the issues. Justifiably, everyone has a little or more anxiety until they see the results. Unfortunately, again, incredible surprises can follow
a success, and our dreams can be aborted.
THE MOST OBVIOUS SIGNS THAT SOME CORRECT ANSWERS AND THOUGHTS ARE OFFERED FOR THEORETICAL RESEARCH
An integrated / comprehensive Answer, not unilateral, namely:
Moral / Psychological Rational Political Cosmological
<•> Intelligent (mental) and cosmological ethic. The regulatory power of thinking for human life and behavior.
The inseparable relation of thinking and intellect to human life and behavior. The spiritual
relationship of human life with itself.
<•> All thoughts from a rational principle: the formation of knowledge, the
concept of truth and knowledge, the principle of senses, the difference between thinking and senses, the recognition of reliability, the
intellectual indeterminacy, and fantasy.
<•> Life, human and society. Spiritual orientation: The global ethic
without the cloak of religion. The intellectual revolution for a moral state (without cheaters, speculators, and embezzlers of confidence,
from one person only or from a group under legal coverage). The intellectual orientation (moral) for society and for the role of the State.
<•> Cosmological theory by removing useless information, reducing
physical phenomena to the most general phenomena (to a few fundamental ones), simplification of concepts. Rational interpretation of the
structure of matter and the astronomical world. Calculations according to measurements of physics, investigation of natural limits,
theoretical observations, and investigation of coincidences. How natural laws and forces are applied.
<•> Review of the earlier philosophical efforts, extracts from philosophical works, comments, and valuations
through contemporary knowledge and experience. Philosophy, religion, and belief.
" BIG QUESTIONS " - SHORT ANSWERS - BIG SURPRISES !
PICTURES FROM
THE PREVIOUS EDITIONS (limited editions)
What they didn't think in Physics and
Philosophy... with common words
► Intellect (or spirit) has not greatest opportunity than of knowing, of maintaining itself as an end in itself and for forming its self-knowledge. Self-knowledge is the meaning of happiness, the essence of logic and the aim of ethic. The egocentricity and delusion solely these themselves are the biggest destruction without any action, and they are immediately related with surrender in fortune. Life without intellect is non-existent and without self-control and self-knowledge it was, is and always will be and everywhere in the Universe an insufficient and unsatisfied life, a self-deluded, seduced, and randomly life and a life with aimless action, despite any other possibilities, that we can imagine.
A
mark of correctness and consistency of each theory: Theory not only describes or explains a phenomenon, but it answers also in queries that this same causes.
Do you discover the philosophy accidentally now? What is the
Philosophy. Philosophy & reality ►>>>►
<•>
Certain first questions about life and the world cannot be answered as irrelevant from each other. Rational research here gives a unified answer. A
unified answer links different issues rationally, that is, with reasonable consistency, showing how they are linked and in accordance with the rules of
simple logic. From expressed thoughts about a cluster of similar issues (e.g., the
question of how we distinguish the truth and how our thinking is influenced by desires), some consequences are drawn that touch our views on many other issues (e.g.,
how much reliable is the history of events that we have learned). We are not talking about explaining a distinct and rare phenomenon. We are talking about a
large package of many answers and an interpretation from which it is revealed how a number of phenomena and many separate issues are connected. That
is, the answer to the questions is unified and not one-sided. One-sided answer = that is, a partial answer according to conjectures and by choosing
a reality detached from other characteristics and laws, if not by choosing a world of our imagination.
* Here's a brilliant example of a unified answer from a book on a Global Ethics:
From the subversive (moral) view about the
relation of thinking and information with deception of a human life, we come to the subversive (sociological) point of view about the facilitation
and protecting for deceivers under State laws and about engaging of the State in partnerships that have no moral priority. How will we observe this
important relation (of deception) if we only focus on issues of psychology or politics alone?
An answer or
solution may be right; however, in most cases answers are given with many hypotheses that we usually conceal. That is, we expect a
result with assumptions such as these: If we have our health. If the other family members are well in their health. If we live in the same house,
in the same area, with the same work, and with the same income. If the same friendships and partnerships are maintained. If we can find the
same things on the market and offer the same services. If the technologies we are familiar with do not change. If our acquaintances and
friends will think with the same opinions and considerations. If we do not have to pay a lot of money for an extraordinary event. If the
same government policy is implemented. If some lies do not spread against us. If the unsightly flaw on the epidermis or on our body is not
healed. If we have the same desire and patience. If our good relationship with loved ones does not spoil. If our appearance will be the
same. If the difference in age does not prevent us. If our opinion (our own or of others) does not change after better knowledge and
information.
If our love affair does not spoil. If what we usually eat is just as safe for our health. 
>>>►
Download and print this page
Moral / Psychological 
