If we list many things or facts to explain a result, then it seems that none of the
separate things can define as a "sufficient cause". If the effects that determine a result are many and all together contribute, then the concept of "cause"
is used abusively and "neutralized". The "many reasons" as we think of them neutralize the meaning of the cause. If the result is a unique or rare
combination of many effects, then we almost conclude that the result is accidental and if it is not accidental, then we ignore the reality it needed to
determine it. The causes stand out from the results in human thought when the movements are slow and when things are remote in space, because the whole world is
absent from human observation and thought. Some results are often repeated and continue to reproduce despite the changes that occur and despite the differences
of things. If global laws and constant elements of reality impose as causes the repetition of certain phenomena and maintaining common reality then in vain we
try to prevent such causes. A sloppy line will not stop being such a line if we change the corner and the rate that the line is repeated.
Most experts limit knowledge as useful in the relationship of the cause with the result, because with such knowledge we can
repeat exactly the result. Knowledge of the relationship of the cause with the result is also doubtful for a certain reason (global and
interdisciplinary law of logic), which no one wants to think: When the action is recipient then the causes do not bring results regardless of the
recipient of the action. For example, the same seed will not grow the same in different soil and environment. The same consumption of sugar will
not produce the same effects on different biological bodies. The results are not the same in different action recipients. Many results will be the
same in similar recipients. But not all results are the same and all the time. This law of the recipient's participation and the conditions in the
action not only explain the differences in the result to different recipients; it also explains the resemblance of the result to similar recipients
of action. If the causes produce results along with a recipient of the action, then the causes cannot be easily separated from the results.**
If the causes produce results with an recipient of the action, then the recipient of the action is always the first part involved - in addition to
the causes - that we must know. So since the action on different recipients produces results with differences and not all the same, so we do not
wonder when different conclusions and observations from many research are published. We wonder when the conclusions of one study are presented as a
denial of another's conclusions. We wonder and laugh especially when the conclusions are generalized and are expecting that the same results will be
done for the lives of all people.
Footnote
* There are many examples that you
can think of.
|
COSMONOMY: A Science that was missing. Science for every science and for the priority in
knowledge. |
- |
Cosmonomy of Nature + Cosmonomy of Spirit
(Physical Cosmonomy and Spiritual Cosmonomy)
The ignorance of the world that animals and humans have is linked to the phenomenon that most of the world (and those who can exist) are
missing from their intellect >>>
|
